[RFC, PATCH 07/22] x86/mm: Mask out KeyID bits from page table entry pfn

From: Kirill A. Shutemov
Date: Mon Mar 05 2018 - 11:31:10 EST


MKTME claims several upper bits of the physical address in a page table
entry to encode KeyID. It effectively shrinks number of bits for
physical address. We should exclude KeyID bits from physical addresses.

For instance, if CPU enumerates 52 physical address bits and number of
bits claimed for KeyID is 6, bits 51:46 must not be threated as part
physical address.

This patch adjusts __PHYSICAL_MASK during MKTME enumeration.

Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
index c770689490b5..35436bbadd0b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
@@ -580,6 +580,30 @@ static void detect_tme(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
mktme_status = MKTME_ENABLED;
}

+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MKTME
+ if (mktme_status == MKTME_ENABLED && nr_keyids) {
+ /*
+ * Mask out bits claimed from KeyID from physical address mask.
+ *
+ * For instance, if a CPU enumerates 52 physical address bits
+ * and number of bits claimed for KeyID is 6, bits 51:46 of
+ * physical address is unusable.
+ */
+ phys_addr_t keyid_mask;
+
+ keyid_mask = 1ULL << c->x86_phys_bits;
+ keyid_mask -= 1ULL << (c->x86_phys_bits - keyid_bits);
+ physical_mask &= ~keyid_mask;
+ } else {
+ /*
+ * Reset __PHYSICAL_MASK.
+ * Maybe needed if there's inconsistent configuation
+ * between CPUs.
+ */
+ physical_mask = (1ULL << __PHYSICAL_MASK_SHIFT) - 1;
+ }
+#endif
+
/*
* Exclude KeyID bits from physical address bits.
*
--
2.16.1