[PATCH v2] cpufreq: schedutil: rate limits for SCHED_DEADLINE

From: Claudio Scordino
Date: Wed Feb 28 2018 - 06:06:31 EST


When the SCHED_DEADLINE scheduling class increases the CPU utilization,
we should not wait for the rate limit, otherwise we may miss some
deadline.

Tests using rt-app on Exynos5422 with up to 10 SCHED_DEADLINE tasks have
shown reductions of even 10% of deadline misses with a negligible
increase of energy consumption (measured through Baylibre Cape).

Signed-off-by: Claudio Scordino <claudio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
CC: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@xxxxxxx>
CC: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@xxxxxxx>
CC: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@xxxxxxx>
CC: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@xxxxxxxxxx>
CC: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
CC: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@xxxxxxxxxx>
CC: Todd Kjos <tkjos@xxxxxxxxxxx>
CC: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@xxxxxxxxxx>
CC: linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
CC: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
Changes from v1:
- Logic moved from sugov_should_update_freq() to
sugov_update_single()/_shared() to not duplicate data structures
- Rate limit not ignored in case of "fast switch"
---
kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
index 7936f54..ca6ce72 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
@@ -273,6 +273,14 @@ static void sugov_update_single(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 time,
sugov_set_iowait_boost(sg_cpu, time);
sg_cpu->last_update = time;

+ /*
+ * Make sugov_should_update_freq() ignore the rate limit when DL
+ * has increased the utilization.
+ */
+ if ((cpu_util_dl(cpu_rq(sg_cpu->cpu)) > sg_cpu->util_dl) &&
+ !(sg_policy->policy->fast_switch_enabled))
+ sg_policy->need_freq_update = true;
+
if (!sugov_should_update_freq(sg_policy, time))
return;

@@ -354,6 +362,14 @@ static void sugov_update_shared(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 time,

raw_spin_lock(&sg_policy->update_lock);

+ /*
+ * Make sugov_should_update_freq() ignore the rate limit when DL
+ * has increased the utilization.
+ */
+ if ((cpu_util_dl(cpu_rq(sg_cpu->cpu)) > sg_cpu->util_dl) &&
+ !(sg_policy->policy->fast_switch_enabled))
+ sg_policy->need_freq_update = true;
+
sugov_get_util(sg_cpu);
sg_cpu->flags = flags;

--
2.7.4