Re: Removing architectures without upstream gcc support

[Max Filippov]

On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 8:02 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'd love to see dead architecture ports dropped if they really are
> more or less abandoned.  In addition to your missing gcc port ones
> above (minus openrisc) it seems like frv and m32r certainly qualify,
> and xtensa seems to be going that way with the glibc port being dropped
> now.

It's not that it's been dropped, there have never been an official glibc
port for xtensa, but we're working to get one.

-- 
Thanks.
-- Max