Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86/microcode/intel: Perform a cache flush before ucode update.

From: Borislav Petkov
Date: Wed Feb 21 2018 - 13:26:15 EST


On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 08:49:43AM -0800, Ashok Raj wrote:
> Microcode updates can be safer if the caches are clean.
> Some of the issues around in certain Broadwell parts
> can be addressed by doing a full cache flush.

Take that text...

>
> Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: X86 ML <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Andi Kleen <andi.kleen@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Boris Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
> index eff80df..5d32724 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
> @@ -589,6 +589,7 @@ static int apply_microcode_early(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci, bool early)
> if (!mc)
> return 0;
>

... and put it here as a comment.

> + wbinvd();

This definitely needs to be native_wbinvd(). Early mode don't love pvops.

> /* write microcode via MSR 0x79 */
> native_wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_UCODE_WRITE, (unsigned long)mc->bits);
>
> @@ -805,6 +806,7 @@ static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_intel(int cpu)
> return UCODE_OK;
> }


Ditto.

> + wbinvd();
> /* write microcode via MSR 0x79 */
> wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_UCODE_WRITE, (unsigned long)mc->bits);
>
> --
> 2.7.4
>

--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix ImendÃrffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG NÃrnberg)
--