Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] PCI: Add PCIe port runtime suspend details

From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Tue Feb 20 2018 - 04:32:10 EST


On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 12:14 AM, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Add details about how we decide whether we can put a PCI bridge in D3.
> 9d26d3a8f1b0 ("PCI: Put PCIe ports into D3 during suspend") added this
> support to reduce power consumption on Intel Sunrise Point and Broxton
> platforms.
>
> In some cases we don't use D3 for bridges even when it should work, simply
> because it's impractical to test the configuration, or we tripped over some
> possible hardware issue on older platforms. Links to discussion of the
> PCIe port runtime power management patches, which includes mention of these
> issues, are below.
>
> No functional change.
>
> Link: v1: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1456750566-116248-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Link: v2: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1460111790-92836-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Link: v3: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1460628268-16204-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Link: v4: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1461578004-129094-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Link: v5: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1461919919-120102-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Link: v6: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464855435-32960-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/2858019.9TUCWsDpTB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>

> ---
> drivers/pci/pci.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> index f6a4dd10d9b0..75db77cf3f8f 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> @@ -2260,6 +2260,13 @@ bool pci_bridge_d3_possible(struct pci_dev *bridge)
> {
> unsigned int year;
>
> + /*
> + * In principle we should be able to put conventional PCI bridges
> + * into D3. We only support it for PCIe because (a) we want to
> + * save power on new (2015 and newer) SoCs that can enter deep
> + * low-power states only if PCIe Root Ports are in D3 and (b) we
> + * don't want to risk regressions on older hardware.
> + */
> if (!pci_is_pcie(bridge))
> return false;
>
> @@ -2276,6 +2283,14 @@ bool pci_bridge_d3_possible(struct pci_dev *bridge)
> * hotplug ports handled by firmware in System Management Mode
> * may not be put into D3 by the OS (Thunderbolt on non-Macs).
> * For simplicity, disallow in general for now.
> + *
> + * Per PCIe r4.0, sec 6.7.3.4, if the form factor requires
> + * wake support, a hot-plug capable Downstream Port must
> + * support generation of a wakeup event on hot-plug events
> + * that occur when the system is in a sleep state or the
> + * Port is in device state D1, D2, or D3hot. Therefore, it
> + * might be possible to use D3 even for hot-plug Ports, but
> + * for now we do not.
> */
> if (bridge->is_hotplug_bridge)
> return false;
> @@ -2285,7 +2300,9 @@ bool pci_bridge_d3_possible(struct pci_dev *bridge)
>
> /*
> * It should be safe to put PCIe ports from 2015 or newer
> - * to D3.
> + * to D3. We have vague reports of possible hardware
> + * issues when putting older PCIe ports into D3. See
> + * changelog.
> */
> if (dmi_get_date(DMI_BIOS_DATE, &year, NULL, NULL) &&
> year >= 2015) {
>