Re: [PATCH] EDAC, mv64x60: Remove some code duplication

[Christophe JAILLET]

Le 13/01/2018 Ã 15:22, Borislav Petkov a ÃcritÂ:
> + Chris Packham who's been fixing some stuff in here too.
>
> On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 08:28:21AM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> > Reorder the error handling code in order to release the resources in
> > reverse order than allocation.
> >
> > Introduce a new 'release_group' label in the error handling path and use
> > it to void some code duplication.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   drivers/edac/mv64x60_edac.c | 7 ++++---
> >   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/edac/mv64x60_edac.c b/drivers/edac/mv64x60_edac.c
> > index 3c68bb525d5d..aa5bc1d8f424 100644
> > --- a/drivers/edac/mv64x60_edac.c
> > +++ b/drivers/edac/mv64x60_edac.c
> > @@ -450,8 +450,8 @@ static int mv64x60_cpu_err_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >   					      "cpu", 1, NULL, 0, 0, NULL, 0,
> >   					      edac_dev_idx);
> >   	if (!edac_dev) {
> > -		devres_release_group(&pdev->dev, mv64x60_cpu_err_probe);
> > -		return -ENOMEM;
> > +		res = -ENOMEM;
> > +		goto release_group;
> >   	}
> >   
> >   	pdata = edac_dev->pvt_info;
> > @@ -561,8 +561,9 @@ static int mv64x60_cpu_err_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >   err2:
> >   	edac_device_del_device(&pdev->dev);
> >   err:
> > -	devres_release_group(&pdev->dev, mv64x60_cpu_err_probe);
> >   	edac_device_free_ctl_info(edac_dev);
> > +release_group:
> > +	devres_release_group(&pdev->dev, mv64x60_cpu_err_probe);
> >   	return res;
> >   }
> >   
> > --
> Thanks, looks good. But looking at this driver, mv64x60_mc_err_probe()
> and mv64x60_sram_err_probe() have the same problem too. Can you address them
> with your patch too pls?
Will do. mv64x60_pci_err_probe() also needs some tweaks.

> Also, if you feel like fixing more stuff in this driver, it doesn't use
> the edac_printk() infrastructure but naked printk() calls. It could be
> converted to it.
I will only propose to remove a useless message and improve another one, 
but won't convert the whole driver, sorry.

CJ

> Thx.