[PATCH v6 03/24] mm: Dont assume page-table invariance during faults

From: Laurent Dufour
Date: Fri Jan 12 2018 - 12:26:42 EST


From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

One of the side effects of speculating on faults (without holding
mmap_sem) is that we can race with free_pgtables() and therefore we
cannot assume the page-tables will stick around.

Remove the reliance on the pte pointer.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

[Remove only if !CONFIG_SPF]
Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/memory.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 8a80986fff48..259f621345b2 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -2274,6 +2274,7 @@ int apply_to_page_range(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(apply_to_page_range);

+#ifndef CONFIG_SPF
/*
* handle_pte_fault chooses page fault handler according to an entry which was
* read non-atomically. Before making any commitment, on those architectures
@@ -2297,6 +2298,7 @@ static inline int pte_unmap_same(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd,
pte_unmap(page_table);
return same;
}
+#endif /* CONFIG_SPF */

static inline void cow_user_page(struct page *dst, struct page *src, unsigned long va, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
{
@@ -2884,11 +2886,13 @@ int do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
swapcache = page;
}

+#ifndef CONFIG_SPF
if (!pte_unmap_same(vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd, vmf->pte, vmf->orig_pte)) {
if (page)
put_page(page);
goto out;
}
+#endif

entry = pte_to_swp_entry(vmf->orig_pte);
if (unlikely(non_swap_entry(entry))) {
--
2.7.4