Re: [RESEND PATCH V2 3/4] perf/x86/intel: drain PEBS buffer in event read

From: Liang, Kan
Date: Wed Jan 10 2018 - 09:32:03 EST




On 1/10/2018 5:39 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 07:15:15AM -0800, kan.liang@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

When the PEBS interrupt threshold is larger than one, there is no way to
get exact auto-reload times and value needed for event update unless
flush the PEBS buffer.

Drain the PEBS buffer in event read when large PEBS is enabled.

For the threshold is one, even auto-reload is enabled, it doesn't need
to be specially handled. Because auto-reload is only effect when event
overflow. There is no overflow in event read.

Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 9 +++++++++
arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c | 10 ++++++++++
arch/x86/events/perf_event.h | 2 ++
3 files changed, 21 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
index 09c26a4..bdc35f8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
@@ -2060,6 +2060,14 @@ static void intel_pmu_del_event(struct perf_event *event)
intel_pmu_pebs_del(event);
}
+static void intel_pmu_read_event(struct perf_event *event)
+{
+ if (event->attr.precise_ip)
+ return intel_pmu_pebs_read(event);

check for (event->hw.flags & PERF_X86_EVENT_AUTO_RELOAD)
would be more accurate?


It will narrow down the events.
But considering the readability, I think it would be better to use precise_ip.The exposed functions in ds.c should be generic functions for all PEBS events, not specific case.
I think _AUTO_RELOAD looks too specific.

Thanks,
Kan