Re: [PATCH 8/8] blk-mq: rename blk_mq_hw_ctx->queue_rq_srcu to ->srcu

From: Bart Van Assche
Date: Mon Jan 08 2018 - 18:48:11 EST

Next message: Andi Kleen: "[PATCH] x86/retpoline: Also fill return buffer after idle"
Previous message: Bart Van Assche: "Re: [PATCH 7/8] blk-mq: remove REQ_ATOM_STARTED"
In reply to: Tejun Heo: "[PATCH 8/8] blk-mq: rename blk_mq_hw_ctx->queue_rq_srcu to ->srcu"
Next in thread: Tejun Heo: "[PATCH 7/8] blk-mq: remove REQ_ATOM_STARTED"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, 2018-01-08 at 11:15 -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> The RCU protection has been expanded to cover both queueing and
> completion paths making ->queue_rq_srcu a misnomer. Rename it to
> ->srcu as suggested by Bart.

Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@xxxxxxx>

Next message: Andi Kleen: "[PATCH] x86/retpoline: Also fill return buffer after idle"
Previous message: Bart Van Assche: "Re: [PATCH 7/8] blk-mq: remove REQ_ATOM_STARTED"
In reply to: Tejun Heo: "[PATCH 8/8] blk-mq: rename blk_mq_hw_ctx->queue_rq_srcu to ->srcu"
Next in thread: Tejun Heo: "[PATCH 7/8] blk-mq: remove REQ_ATOM_STARTED"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]