Re: [PATCH net-next 06/20] net: hns3: Modify the update period of packet statistics

[lipeng (Y)]

On 2018/1/5 22:54, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_enet.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_enet.c
> > @@ -1126,6 +1126,7 @@ static int hns3_nic_set_features(struct net_device *netdev,
> >   {
> >   	struct hns3_nic_priv *priv = netdev_priv(netdev);
> >   	int queue_num = priv->ae_handle->kinfo.num_tqps;
> > +	struct hnae3_handle *handle = priv->ae_handle;
> >   	struct hns3_enet_ring *ring;
> >   	unsigned int start;
> >   	unsigned int idx;
> > @@ -1134,6 +1135,8 @@ static int hns3_nic_set_features(struct net_device *netdev,
> >   	u64 tx_pkts = 0;
> >   	u64 rx_pkts = 0;
> >   
> > +	handle->ae_algo->ops->update_stats(handle, &netdev->stats);
> > +
> >   	for (idx = 0; idx < queue_num; idx++) {
> >   		/* fetch the tx stats */
> >   		ring = priv->ring_data[idx].ring;
> There is something odd going on with patch here. Notice how it says
> hns3_nic_set_features(). This is not the function being patched, it is
> actually the next one, hns3_nic_get_stats64(), which makes a lot more
> sense.
>
> Is it because the static void is on the previous line?
Yes, it is because the static void is on the previous line.

I can add one patch to fix the  previous line ,  and this patch will 
correct  automatically.

do it need V2 patchset? or push a new patch after this patchset?

> It would be nice if the function was correctly reported. It makes it
> easier to review the patch.
>
>         Andrew
>
> .