Re: ethernet: mlx4: Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in five functions

[Tariq Toukan]

On 03/01/2018 4:22 PM, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > I don't really accept this claim...
> > Short informative strings worth the tiny space they consume.
>
> There can be different opinions for their usefulness.
>
>
> > In addition, some out-of-memory errors are recoverable, even though their backtrace is also printed.
>
> How do you think about to suppress the backtrace generation for them?
OK, makes sense.

> > For example, in function mlx4_en_create_cq (appears in patch) we have a first allocation attempt (kzalloc_node)
>
> Would it be helpful to pass the option â__GFP_NOWARNâ there?

I'll prepare a patch to use it.
Will ack this patch for now.

> > and a fallback (kzalloc). I'd prefer to state a clear error message only when both have failed,
> > because otherwise the user might be confused whether the backtrace should indicate a malfunctioning interface, or not.
>
> Can the distinction become easier by any other means?
>
> Regards,
> Markus
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html