Re: [PATCH 09/11] fuse: Restrict allow_other to the superblock's namespace or a descendant

From: Serge E. Hallyn
Date: Fri Dec 22 2017 - 22:50:56 EST


On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 03:32:33PM +0100, Dongsu Park wrote:
> From: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Unprivileged users are normally restricted from mounting with the
> allow_other option by system policy, but this could be bypassed
> for a mount done with user namespace root permissions. In such
> cases allow_other should not allow users outside the userns
> to access the mount as doing so would give the unprivileged user
> the ability to manipulate processes it would otherwise be unable
> to manipulate. Restrict allow_other to apply to users in the same
> userns used at mount or a descendant of that namespace. Also
> export current_in_userns() for use by fuse when built as a
> module.
>
> Patch v4 is available: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8944671/
>
> Cc: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Dongsu Park <dongsu@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@xxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
> fs/fuse/dir.c | 2 +-
> kernel/user_namespace.c | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/fuse/dir.c b/fs/fuse/dir.c
> index ad1cfac1..d41559a0 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/fuse/dir.c
> @@ -1030,7 +1030,7 @@ int fuse_allow_current_process(struct fuse_conn *fc)
> const struct cred *cred;
>
> if (fc->allow_other)
> - return 1;
> + return current_in_userns(fc->user_ns);
>
> cred = current_cred();
> if (uid_eq(cred->euid, fc->user_id) &&
> diff --git a/kernel/user_namespace.c b/kernel/user_namespace.c
> index 246d4d4c..492c255e 100644
> --- a/kernel/user_namespace.c
> +++ b/kernel/user_namespace.c
> @@ -1235,6 +1235,7 @@ bool current_in_userns(const struct user_namespace *target_ns)
> {
> return in_userns(target_ns, current_user_ns());
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(current_in_userns);

I have to say I'm not happy with this name. I wish it had been
called current_under_userns or something to indicate it may also
be in a child.

>
> static inline struct user_namespace *to_user_ns(struct ns_common *ns)
> {
> --
> 2.13.6