Re: [PATCH][V2] mtd: sharpslpart: fix overflow on block_adr calculation

From: Boris Brezillon
Date: Mon Dec 18 2017 - 11:27:24 EST


On Fri, 10 Nov 2017 17:35:13 +0100
Andrea Adami <andrea.adami@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Colin King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Multiplying block_num and mtd->erasesize may potentially overflow
> > as they are both unsigned ints and so the multiplication is evaluated
> > in unsigned int arithmetic. Cast block_adr to off_t to ensure
> > multiplication is off_t sized to avoid any potential overflow.
> >
> > Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1461264 ("Unintentional integer overflow")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/mtd/parsers/sharpslpart.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/parsers/sharpslpart.c b/drivers/mtd/parsers/sharpslpart.c
> > index 5fe0079ea5ed..0ddb79ac390d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mtd/parsers/sharpslpart.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/parsers/sharpslpart.c
> > @@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ static int sharpsl_nand_init_ftl(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct sharpsl_ftl *ftl)
> >
> > /* create physical-logical table */
> > for (block_num = 0; block_num < phymax; block_num++) {
> > - block_adr = block_num * mtd->erasesize;
> > + block_adr = (loff_t)block_num * mtd->erasesize;
> >
> > if (mtd_block_isbad(mtd, block_adr))
> > continue;
> > @@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ static int sharpsl_nand_read_laddr(struct mtd_info *mtd,
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > block_num = ftl->log2phy[log_num];
> > - block_adr = block_num * mtd->erasesize;
> > + block_adr = (loff_t)block_num * mtd->erasesize;
> > block_ofs = mtd_mod_by_eb((u32)from, mtd);
> >
> > err = mtd_read(mtd, block_adr + block_ofs, len, &retlen, buf);
> > --
> > 2.14.1
> >
>
> Thanks for spotting this,
>
> Acked-by: Andrea Adami <andrea.adami@xxxxxxxxx>

Applied.

Thanks,

Boris