Re: [PATCH resend v2] mux: core: Fix double get_device()

From: Peter Rosin
Date: Mon Dec 04 2017 - 11:18:43 EST


On 2017-11-28 10:05, Hans de Goede wrote:
> class_find_device already does a get_device on the returned device.
> So the device returned by of_find_mux_chip_by_node is already referenced
> and we should not reference it again (and unref it on error).
>
> Also rename of_find_mux_chip_by_node to of_get_mux_chip_by_node to
> make it clear that it returns a reference.

Yep, I forgot. Sorry about that. I'll try to do better this time...

Cheers,
Peter

> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> -Do not rename of_find_mux_chip_by_node
> ---
> drivers/mux/core.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mux/core.c b/drivers/mux/core.c
> index 2260063b0ea8..6e5cf9d9cd99 100644
> --- a/drivers/mux/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mux/core.c
> @@ -413,6 +413,7 @@ static int of_dev_node_match(struct device *dev, const void *data)
> return dev->of_node == data;
> }
>
> +/* Note this function returns a reference to the mux_chip dev. */
> static struct mux_chip *of_find_mux_chip_by_node(struct device_node *np)
> {
> struct device *dev;
> @@ -466,6 +467,7 @@ struct mux_control *mux_control_get(struct device *dev, const char *mux_name)
> (!args.args_count && (mux_chip->controllers > 1))) {
> dev_err(dev, "%pOF: wrong #mux-control-cells for %pOF\n",
> np, args.np);
> + put_device(&mux_chip->dev);
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> }
>
> @@ -476,10 +478,10 @@ struct mux_control *mux_control_get(struct device *dev, const char *mux_name)
> if (controller >= mux_chip->controllers) {
> dev_err(dev, "%pOF: bad mux controller %u specified in %pOF\n",
> np, controller, args.np);
> + put_device(&mux_chip->dev);
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> }
>
> - get_device(&mux_chip->dev);
> return &mux_chip->mux[controller];
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mux_control_get);
>