Re: [PATCH v2] tpm: return a TPM_RC_COMMAND_CODE response if a command isn't implemented

[Jarkko Sakkinen]

On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 12:08:46PM +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> +#define TPM2_RC_LAYER_SHIFT	16
> +#define TPM2_RESMGRTPM_RC_LAYER (11 << TPM2_RC_LAYER_SHIFT)

I got this spec from Philip [1].

Couple of remarks:

* What is the difference between TSS2_RESMGR_RC_LAYER and
  TSS2_RESMGR_TPM_RC_LAYER?
* Should the driver code use TSS2 or TPM2 prefix?

[1] https://trustedcomputinggroup.org/wp-content/uploads/TCG-TSS-2.0-Overview-and-Common-Structures-Specification-Version-0.90-Revision-02.pdf

/Jarkko