Re: ALSA: nm256: Fine-tuning for three function implementations

From: SF Markus Elfring
Date: Tue Nov 28 2017 - 14:49:55 EST

Next message: Andrew Cooper: "Re: [RFC PATCH] KVM: x86: Allow Qemu/KVM to use PVH entry point"
Previous message: Thomas Gleixner: "Re: [PATCH] x86/syscalls: Mark expected switch fall-throughs"
In reply to: Takashi Iwai: "Re: ALSA: nm256: Fine-tuning for three function implementations"
Next in thread: Takashi Iwai: "Re: ALSA: nm256: Fine-tuning for three function implementations"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Because it turned out that your patch can be wrong and broken.

At which point did you change you mind for any of my (higher level) patches?

Regards,
Markus

Next message: Andrew Cooper: "Re: [RFC PATCH] KVM: x86: Allow Qemu/KVM to use PVH entry point"
Previous message: Thomas Gleixner: "Re: [PATCH] x86/syscalls: Mark expected switch fall-throughs"
In reply to: Takashi Iwai: "Re: ALSA: nm256: Fine-tuning for three function implementations"
Next in thread: Takashi Iwai: "Re: ALSA: nm256: Fine-tuning for three function implementations"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]