Re: [patch V2 01/11] Documentation: Add license-rules.rst to describe how to properly identify file licenses

From: Carmen Bianca Bakker
Date: Fri Nov 17 2017 - 05:18:15 EST

Next message: Mauro Carvalho Chehab: "[PATCH 3/6] media: i2c: add SPDX identifiers to the code I wrote"
Previous message: Arnd Bergmann: "[PATCH] mm: fix nodemask printing"
In reply to: Greg Kroah-Hartman: "Re: [patch V2 01/11] Documentation: Add license-rules.rst to describe how to properly identify file licenses"
Next in thread: Thomas Gleixner: "Re: [patch V2 01/11] Documentation: Add license-rules.rst to describe how to properly identify file licenses"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Went through the documentation with a fine comb.ÂÂApart from Jonathan's
good comments, I could only find the following nitpick.

Thomas Gleixner schreef op do 16-11-2017 om 19:33 [+0100]:
> +All SPDX license identifiers and exceptions must have a corresponding file
> +in the LICENSING subdirectories. This is required to allow tool

LICENSES, surely :)

Documentation looks really good otherwise!

--Â
Carmen Bianca Bakker
Technical Intern
Free Software Foundation Europe e.V.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Next message: Mauro Carvalho Chehab: "[PATCH 3/6] media: i2c: add SPDX identifiers to the code I wrote"
Previous message: Arnd Bergmann: "[PATCH] mm: fix nodemask printing"
In reply to: Greg Kroah-Hartman: "Re: [patch V2 01/11] Documentation: Add license-rules.rst to describe how to properly identify file licenses"
Next in thread: Thomas Gleixner: "Re: [patch V2 01/11] Documentation: Add license-rules.rst to describe how to properly identify file licenses"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]