Re: [v2] can: Use common error handling code in vxcan_newlink()

[SF Markus Elfring]

> Acked-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks for another positive feedback.


> Again: Posting such a patch on linux-can@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx is ENOUGH!

I was informed in an other way for Linux software patches.


> No need to cross post such a patch additionally on
> 
> netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

These addresses were suggested (or recommended?) by the script âget_maintainer.plâ.


> kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I tend to add this address also for my update suggestions.


> and to each of the maintainers
â
> We all subscribed the mailing list and listen to it.

This is generally fine. - But I do not know how long such subscriptions
will be active.


> That's the intention of a mailing list ...

I know â


> Cross posting is not appreciated in the community.

How does this view fit to the information in the section â5) Select
the recipients for your patchâ from the document âsubmitting-patches.rstâ?

Regards,
Markus