Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: typec: tcpm: Validate source and sink caps

[Badhri Jagan Sridharan]

Sorry about delay. Just sent the rebased patchset along with the comments
addressed.

Thanks & Regards,
Badhri.

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 3:20 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 06:22:13PM -0700, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote:
>> The source and sink caps should follow the following rules.
>> This patch validates whether the src_caps/snk_caps adheres
>> to it.
>>
>> 6.4.1 Capabilities Message
>> A Capabilities message (Source Capabilities message or Sink
>> Capabilities message) shall have at least one Power
>> Data Object for vSafe5V. The Capabilities message shall also
>> contain the sending Portâs information followed by up to
>> 6 additional Power Data Objects. Power Data Objects in a
>> Capabilities message shall be sent in the following order:
>>
>> 1. The vSafe5V Fixed Supply Object shall always be the first object.
>> 2. The remaining Fixed Supply Objects, if present, shall be sent
>>    in voltage order; lowest to highest.
>> 3. The Battery Supply Objects, if present shall be sent in Minimum
>>    Voltage order; lowest to highest.
>> 4. The Variable Supply (non-battery) Objects, if present, shall be
>>    sent in Minimum Voltage order; lowest to highest.
>>
>> Errors in source/sink_caps of the local port will prevent
>> the port registration. Whereas, errors in source caps of partner
>> device would only log them.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Badhri Jagan Sridharan <Badhri@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/staging/typec/pd.h   |   2 +
>>  drivers/staging/typec/tcpm.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>  drivers/staging/typec/tcpm.h |  16 +++----
>>  3 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
>
> Now that these files are moved in my usb tree, can you rebase and resend
> them?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h