Re: [PATCH] HID: usbhid: fix out-of-bounds bug

From: Alan Stern
Date: Tue Sep 26 2017 - 16:22:59 EST


On Wed, 27 Sep 2017, Jaejoong Kim wrote:

> Hi, Alan,
>
> Thanks for the review.
>
> 2017-09-26 23:18 GMT+09:00 Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > On Tue, 26 Sep 2017, Jaejoong Kim wrote:
> >
> >> The starting address of the hid descriptor is obtained via
> >> usb_get_extra_descriptor(). If the hid descriptor has the wrong size, it
> >> is possible to access the wrong address. So, before accessing the hid
> >> descriptor, we need to check the entire size through the bLength field.
> >>
> >> It also shows how many class descriptors it has through the bNumDescriptors
> >> of the hid descriptor. Assuming that the connected hid descriptor has two
> >> class descriptors(report and physical descriptors), the code below can
> >> cause OOB because hdesc->desc is an array of size 1.
> >>
> >> for (n = 0; n < hdesc->bNumDescriptors; n++)
> >> if (hdesc->desc[n].bDescriptorType == HID_DT_REPORT)
> >> rsize = le16_to_cpu(hdesc->desc[n].wDescriptorLength);
> >>
> >> Since we know the starting address of the hid descriptor and the value of
> >> the bNumDescriptors is variable, we directly access the buffer containing
> >> the hid descriptor without usbing hdesc->desc to obtain the size of the
> >> report descriptor.
> >
> > I do not like this patch at all.
> >
> >> diff --git a/drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c b/drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c
> >> index 089bad8..7bad173 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c
> >> @@ -970,12 +970,19 @@ static int usbhid_parse(struct hid_device *hid)
> >> struct usb_interface *intf = to_usb_interface(hid->dev.parent);
> >> struct usb_host_interface *interface = intf->cur_altsetting;
> >> struct usb_device *dev = interface_to_usbdev (intf);
> >> - struct hid_descriptor *hdesc;
> >> + unsigned char *buffer = intf->altsetting->extra;
> >> + int buflen = intf->altsetting->extralen;
> >> + int length;
> >> u32 quirks = 0;
> >> unsigned int rsize = 0;
> >> char *rdesc;
> >> int ret, n;
> >>
> >> + if (!buffer) {
> >> + dbg_hid("class descriptor not present\n");
> >> + return -ENODEV;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> quirks = usbhid_lookup_quirk(le16_to_cpu(dev->descriptor.idVendor),
> >> le16_to_cpu(dev->descriptor.idProduct));
> >>
> >> @@ -990,19 +997,27 @@ static int usbhid_parse(struct hid_device *hid)
> >> quirks |= HID_QUIRK_NOGET;
> >> }
> >>
> >> - if (usb_get_extra_descriptor(interface, HID_DT_HID, &hdesc) &&
> >> - (!interface->desc.bNumEndpoints ||
> >> - usb_get_extra_descriptor(&interface->endpoint[0], HID_DT_HID, &hdesc))) {
> >> - dbg_hid("class descriptor not present\n");
> >> - return -ENODEV;
> >> - }
> >> + while (buflen > 2) {
> >> + length = buffer[0];
> >> + if (!length || length < HID_DESCRIPTOR_MIN_SIZE)
> >> + goto next_desc;
> >
> > It's silly to duplicate the code that is already present in
> > usb_get_extra_descriptor(). There's no reason to avoid using that
> > function here.
>
> To be honest, I was fooled. You are right. That is a duplicate code
> with usb_get_extra_descriptor().
>
> >
> >> - hid->version = le16_to_cpu(hdesc->bcdHID);
> >> - hid->country = hdesc->bCountryCode;
> >> + if (buffer[1] == HID_DT_HID) {
> >> + hid->version = get_unaligned_le16(&buffer[2]);
> >> + hid->country = buffer[4];
> >
> > It's also silly not to use the preformatted hid_descriptor structure and
> > instead put error-prone byte offsets directly into the code.
>
> Right.
>
> >
> >> - for (n = 0; n < hdesc->bNumDescriptors; n++)
> >> - if (hdesc->desc[n].bDescriptorType == HID_DT_REPORT)
> >> - rsize = le16_to_cpu(hdesc->desc[n].wDescriptorLength);
> >> + for (n = 0; n < buffer[5]; n++) {
> >> + /* we are just interested in report descriptor */
> >> + if (buffer[6+3*n] != HID_DT_REPORT)
> >> + continue;
> >> + rsize = get_unaligned_le16(&buffer[7+3*n]);
> >
> > Finally, this patch doesn't fix the actual problem! You don't check
> > here whether 8+3*n >= length.
> >
> > This whole thing could be fixed with a much smaller change to the
> > original code. Just do something like this:
> >
> > num_descriptors = min_t(int, hdesc->bNumDescriptors,
> > (hdesc->bLength - 6) / 3);
> > for (n = 0; n < num_descriptors; n++)
>
> Right. Your change is better and clear.
> With your change, I think we need check the size of hdesc before
> accessing hdesc->desc[n] as Andrey Konovalov has already pointed out,
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c b/drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c
> index 089bad8..0b41d44 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c
> @@ -975,6 +975,7 @@ static int usbhid_parse(struct hid_device *hid)
> unsigned int rsize = 0;
> char *rdesc;
> int ret, n;
> + int num_descriptors;
>
> quirks = usbhid_lookup_quirk(le16_to_cpu(dev->descriptor.idVendor),
> le16_to_cpu(dev->descriptor.idProduct));
> @@ -997,10 +998,17 @@ static int usbhid_parse(struct hid_device *hid)
> return -ENODEV;
> }
>
> + if (hdesc->bLength < sizeof(struct hid_descriptor)) {
> + dbg_hid("hid descriptor is too short\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> hid->version = le16_to_cpu(hdesc->bcdHID);
> hid->country = hdesc->bCountryCode;
>
> - for (n = 0; n < hdesc->bNumDescriptors; n++)
> + num_descriptors = min_t(int, hdesc->bNumDescriptors,
> + (hdesc->bLength - 6) / 3);
> + for (n = 0; n < num_descriptors; n++)
> if (hdesc->desc[n].bDescriptorType == HID_DT_REPORT)
> rsize = le16_to_cpu(hdesc->desc[n].wDescriptorLength);

Yes, this is a lot better.

Alan Stern