Re: [PATCH v2] ACPI / APEI: Suppress message if HEST not present

From: Punit Agrawal
Date: Tue Aug 29 2017 - 09:17:30 EST


Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx> writes:

> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 12:27:53PM +0100, Punit Agrawal wrote:
>> According to the ACPI specification, firmware is not required to provide
>> the Hardware Error Source Table (HEST). When HEST is not present, the
>> following superfluous message is printed to the kernel boot log -
>>
>> [ 3.460067] GHES: HEST is not enabled!
>>
>> Extend hest_disable variable to track whether the firmware provides this
>> table and if it is not present skip any log output. The existing
>> behaviour is preserved in all other cases.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@xxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>
>> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@xxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c | 4 ++--
>> drivers/acpi/apei/hest.c | 13 +++++++------
>> include/acpi/apei.h | 8 +++++++-
>> 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
>> index d661d452b238..f8685bcbeff2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
>> @@ -1262,10 +1262,10 @@ static int __init ghes_init(void)
>> {
>> int rc;
>>
>> - if (acpi_disabled)
>> + if (acpi_disabled || hest_disable == HEST_NOT_FOUND)
>> return -ENODEV;
>>
>> - if (hest_disable) {
>> + if (hest_disable == HEST_DISABLED) {
>> pr_info(GHES_PFX "HEST is not enabled!\n");
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>
> Yap, looks good.
>
> Just a minor nitpick: I'd additionally group the hest_disable checking
> in one switch-case, so that the code flow is obvious at a quick glance:
>
> if (acpi_disabled)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> switch (hest_disable) {
> case HEST_NOT_FOUND:
> return -ENODEV;
> case HEST_DISABLED:
> pr_info(GHES_PFX "HEST is not enabled!\n");
> return -EINVAL;
> default:
> break;
> }

I've picked this change and will send out an update shortly.

Thanks,
Punit