Re: [PATCH 2/8] irqchip: stm32: add multi-bank management

[Marc Zyngier]

On 07/07/17 08:26, Ludovic Barre wrote:
> From: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@xxxxxx>
> 
> -prepare to manage multi-bank
> -prepare to manage registers offset by compatible
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@xxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c | 137 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 91 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c
> index 491568c..308cef5 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c
> @@ -14,27 +14,52 @@
>  #include <linux/of_address.h>
>  #include <linux/of_irq.h>
>  
> -#define EXTI_IMR	0x0
> -#define EXTI_EMR	0x4
> -#define EXTI_RTSR	0x8
> -#define EXTI_FTSR	0xc
> -#define EXTI_SWIER	0x10
> -#define EXTI_PR		0x14
> +struct stm32_exti_bank {
> +	u32 imr_ofst;
> +	u32 emr_ofst;
> +	u32 rtsr_ofst;
> +	u32 ftsr_ofst;
> +	u32 swier_ofst;
> +	u32 pr_ofst;
> +
> +	u32 irqs_mask;
> +};

This looks weird. On one hand, you have a set of offsets that are
typical of the HW, and yet you add to it a mask that is read from the HW
(and not hardcoded like the rest).

> +
> +static struct stm32_exti_bank stm32f4xx_exti_b1 = {
> +	.imr_ofst	= 0x00,
> +	.emr_ofst	= 0x04,
> +	.rtsr_ofst	= 0x08,
> +	.ftsr_ofst	= 0x0C,
> +	.swier_ofst	= 0x10,
> +	.pr_ofst	= 0x14,
> +};

And this prevents making this structure const, which it should be.

> +
> +static struct stm32_exti_bank *stm32f4xx_exti_banks[] = {
> +	&stm32f4xx_exti_b1,
> +};
>  
>  static void stm32_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
>  {
>  	struct irq_domain *domain = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
> -	struct irq_chip_generic *gc = domain->gc->gc[0];
>  	struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
> +	unsigned int virq, nbanks = domain->gc->num_chips;
> +	struct irq_chip_generic *gc;
> +	struct stm32_exti_bank *stm32_bank;
>  	unsigned long pending;
> -	int n;
> +	int n, i, irq_base = 0;
>  
>  	chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
>  
> -	while ((pending = irq_reg_readl(gc, EXTI_PR))) {
> -		for_each_set_bit(n, &pending, BITS_PER_LONG) {
> -			generic_handle_irq(irq_find_mapping(domain, n));
> -			irq_reg_writel(gc, BIT(n), EXTI_PR);
> +	for (i = 0; i < nbanks; i++, irq_base += BITS_PER_LONG) {

Are you guaranteed that all the interrupts are organised in a linear
way? No hole between them? Ever?

> +		gc = irq_get_domain_generic_chip(domain, irq_base);
> +		stm32_bank = gc->private;
> +
> +		while ((pending = irq_reg_readl(gc, stm32_bank->pr_ofst))) {
> +			for_each_set_bit(n, &pending, BITS_PER_LONG) {
> +				virq = irq_find_mapping(domain, irq_base + n);
> +				generic_handle_irq(virq);
> +				irq_reg_writel(gc, BIT(n), stm32_bank->pr_ofst);

This code doesn't look very good. Since you already have the bank as
part of your gc structure, why don't you add a set of wrappers such as:

static void stm32_irq_write_pr(struct irq_chip_generic *gc, u32 val)
{
	struct stm32_exti_bank *bank = gc->private;
	irq_reg_writel(gc, val, bank->pr_ofst);
}

Nobody really want to know about this offset business, so just hide it
as much as possible.

> +			}
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> @@ -44,13 +69,14 @@ static void stm32_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
>  static int stm32_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int type)
>  {
>  	struct irq_chip_generic *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> -	int pin = data->hwirq;
> +	struct stm32_exti_bank *stm32_bank = gc->private;
> +	int pin = data->hwirq % BITS_PER_LONG;
>  	u32 rtsr, ftsr;
>  
>  	irq_gc_lock(gc);
>  
> -	rtsr = irq_reg_readl(gc, EXTI_RTSR);
> -	ftsr = irq_reg_readl(gc, EXTI_FTSR);
> +	rtsr = irq_reg_readl(gc, stm32_bank->rtsr_ofst);
> +	ftsr = irq_reg_readl(gc, stm32_bank->ftsr_ofst);
>  
>  	switch (type) {
>  	case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING:
> @@ -70,8 +96,8 @@ static int stm32_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int type)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> -	irq_reg_writel(gc, rtsr, EXTI_RTSR);
> -	irq_reg_writel(gc, ftsr, EXTI_FTSR);
> +	irq_reg_writel(gc, rtsr, stm32_bank->rtsr_ofst);
> +	irq_reg_writel(gc, ftsr, stm32_bank->ftsr_ofst);
>  
>  	irq_gc_unlock(gc);
>  
> @@ -81,17 +107,18 @@ static int stm32_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int type)
>  static int stm32_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int on)
>  {
>  	struct irq_chip_generic *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> -	int pin = data->hwirq;
> +	struct stm32_exti_bank *stm32_bank = gc->private;
> +	int pin = data->hwirq % BITS_PER_LONG;
>  	u32 emr;
>  
>  	irq_gc_lock(gc);
>  
> -	emr = irq_reg_readl(gc, EXTI_EMR);
> +	emr = irq_reg_readl(gc, stm32_bank->emr_ofst);
>  	if (on)
>  		emr |= BIT(pin);
>  	else
>  		emr &= ~BIT(pin);
> -	irq_reg_writel(gc, emr, EXTI_EMR);
> +	irq_reg_writel(gc, emr, stm32_bank->emr_ofst);
>  
>  	irq_gc_unlock(gc);
>  
> @@ -101,11 +128,12 @@ static int stm32_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int on)
>  static int stm32_exti_alloc(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq,
>  			    unsigned int nr_irqs, void *data)
>  {
> -	struct irq_chip_generic *gc = d->gc->gc[0];
> +	struct irq_chip_generic *gc;
>  	struct irq_fwspec *fwspec = data;
>  	irq_hw_number_t hwirq;
>  
>  	hwirq = fwspec->param[0];
> +	gc = irq_get_domain_generic_chip(d, hwirq);
>  
>  	irq_map_generic_chip(d, virq, hwirq);
>  	irq_domain_set_info(d, virq, hwirq, &gc->chip_types->chip, gc,
> @@ -129,8 +157,8 @@ struct irq_domain_ops irq_exti_domain_ops = {
>  	.free	= stm32_exti_free,
>  };
>  
> -static int __init stm32_exti_init(struct device_node *node,
> -				  struct device_node *parent)
> +static int __init stm32_exti_init(struct stm32_exti_bank **stm32_exti_banks,
> +				  int bank_nr, struct device_node *node)
>  {
>  	unsigned int clr = IRQ_NOREQUEST | IRQ_NOPROBE | IRQ_NOAUTOEN;
>  	int nr_irqs, nr_exti, ret, i;
> @@ -144,23 +172,16 @@ static int __init stm32_exti_init(struct device_node *node,
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  	}
>  
> -	/* Determine number of irqs supported */
> -	writel_relaxed(~0UL, base + EXTI_RTSR);
> -	nr_exti = fls(readl_relaxed(base + EXTI_RTSR));
> -	writel_relaxed(0, base + EXTI_RTSR);
> -
> -	pr_info("%s: %d External IRQs detected\n", node->full_name, nr_exti);
> -
> -	domain = irq_domain_add_linear(node, nr_exti,
> +	domain = irq_domain_add_linear(node, bank_nr * BITS_PER_LONG,

You used to size the domain with the number of *implemented* interrupts.
Now, it becomes something else. Why is that so? Also, is BITS_PER_LONG
the right macro? Shouldn't it be something like "IRQS_PER_BANK", or
something similar? Just in case someone recycles this block on a 64bit
CPU...

>  				       &irq_exti_domain_ops, NULL);
>  	if (!domain) {
>  		pr_err("%s: Could not register interrupt domain.\n",
> -				node->name);
> +		       node->name);
>  		ret = -ENOMEM;
>  		goto out_unmap;
>  	}
>  
> -	ret = irq_alloc_domain_generic_chips(domain, nr_exti, 1, "exti",
> +	ret = irq_alloc_domain_generic_chips(domain, BITS_PER_LONG, 1, "exti",

And here, you're not multiplying it by the number of banks. Why?

>  					     handle_edge_irq, clr, 0, 0);
>  	if (ret) {
>  		pr_err("%s: Could not allocate generic interrupt chip.\n",
> @@ -168,18 +189,35 @@ static int __init stm32_exti_init(struct device_node *node,
>  		goto out_free_domain;
>  	}
>  
> -	gc = domain->gc->gc[0];
> -	gc->reg_base                         = base;
> -	gc->chip_types->type               = IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH;
> -	gc->chip_types->chip.name          = gc->chip_types[0].chip.name;
> -	gc->chip_types->chip.irq_ack       = irq_gc_ack_set_bit;
> -	gc->chip_types->chip.irq_mask      = irq_gc_mask_clr_bit;
> -	gc->chip_types->chip.irq_unmask    = irq_gc_mask_set_bit;
> -	gc->chip_types->chip.irq_set_type  = stm32_irq_set_type;
> -	gc->chip_types->chip.irq_set_wake  = stm32_irq_set_wake;
> -	gc->chip_types->regs.ack           = EXTI_PR;
> -	gc->chip_types->regs.mask          = EXTI_IMR;
> -	gc->chip_types->handler            = handle_edge_irq;
> +	for (i = 0; i < bank_nr; i++) {
> +		struct stm32_exti_bank *stm32_bank = stm32_exti_banks[i];
> +		u32 irqs_mask;
> +
> +		gc = irq_get_domain_generic_chip(domain, i * BITS_PER_LONG);
> +
> +		gc->reg_base = base;
> +		gc->chip_types->type = IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH;
> +		gc->chip_types->chip.name = gc->chip_types[0].chip.name;
> +		gc->chip_types->chip.irq_ack = irq_gc_ack_set_bit;
> +		gc->chip_types->chip.irq_mask = irq_gc_mask_clr_bit;
> +		gc->chip_types->chip.irq_unmask = irq_gc_mask_set_bit;
> +		gc->chip_types->chip.irq_set_type = stm32_irq_set_type;
> +		gc->chip_types->chip.irq_set_wake = stm32_irq_set_wake;
> +		gc->chip_types->regs.ack = stm32_bank->pr_ofst;
> +		gc->chip_types->regs.mask = stm32_bank->imr_ofst;
> +		gc->chip_types->handler = handle_edge_irq;
> +		gc->private = stm32_bank;
> +
> +		/* Determine number of irqs supported */
> +		writel_relaxed(~0UL, base + stm32_bank->rtsr_ofst);
> +		irqs_mask = readl_relaxed(base + stm32_bank->rtsr_ofst);
> +		stm32_bank->irqs_mask = irqs_mask;
> +		nr_exti = fls(readl_relaxed(base + stm32_bank->rtsr_ofst));
> +		writel_relaxed(0, base + stm32_bank->rtsr_ofst);
> +
> +		pr_info("%s: bank%d, External IRQs available:%#x\n",
> +			node->full_name, i, irqs_mask);
> +	}
>  
>  	nr_irqs = of_irq_count(node);
>  	for (i = 0; i < nr_irqs; i++) {
> @@ -198,4 +236,11 @@ static int __init stm32_exti_init(struct device_node *node,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -IRQCHIP_DECLARE(stm32_exti, "st,stm32-exti", stm32_exti_init);
> +static int __init stm32f4_exti_of_init(struct device_node *np,
> +				       struct device_node *parent)
> +{
> +	return stm32_exti_init(stm32f4xx_exti_banks,
> +			ARRAY_SIZE(stm32f4xx_exti_banks), np);
> +}
> +
> +IRQCHIP_DECLARE(stm32f4_exti, "st,stm32-exti", stm32f4_exti_of_init);
> 

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...