Re: [PATCH] mm, oom: fix potential data corruption when oom_reaper races with writer

[Michal Hocko]

On Fri 04-08-17 19:41:42, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Fri 04-08-17 17:25:46, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > > Well, while lockdep warning is gone, this problem is remaining.
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> > > index edabf6f..1e06c29 100644
> > > --- a/mm/memory.c
> > > +++ b/mm/memory.c
> > > @@ -3931,15 +3931,14 @@ int handle_mm_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
> > >         /*
> > >          * This mm has been already reaped by the oom reaper and so the
> > >          * refault cannot be trusted in general. Anonymous refaults would
> > > -        * lose data and give a zero page instead e.g. This is especially
> > > -        * problem for use_mm() because regular tasks will just die and
> > > -        * the corrupted data will not be visible anywhere while kthread
> > > -        * will outlive the oom victim and potentially propagate the date
> > > -        * further.
> > > +        * lose data and give a zero page instead e.g.
> > >          */
> > > -       if (unlikely((current->flags & PF_KTHREAD) && !(ret & VM_FAULT_ERROR)
> > > -                               && test_bit(MMF_UNSTABLE, &vma->vm_mm->flags)))
> > > +       if (unlikely(!(ret & VM_FAULT_ERROR)
> > > +                    && test_bit(MMF_UNSTABLE, &vma->vm_mm->flags))) {
> > > +               if (ret & VM_FAULT_RETRY)
> > > +                       down_read(&vma->vm_mm->mmap_sem);
> > >                 ret = VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
> > > +       }
> > > 
> > >         return ret;
> > >  }
> > 
> > I have re-read your email again and I guess I misread previously. Are
> > you saying that the data corruption happens with the both patches
> > applied?
> 
> Yes. Data corruption still happens.

I guess I managed to reproduce finally. Will investigate further.

Thanks!
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs