Re: [PATCH 28/29] drm/vmwgfx: switch to drm_*{get,put} helpers

[Daniel Vetter]

On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 02:40:43PM +0200, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> On 08/03/2017 01:58 PM, Cihangir Akturk wrote:
> > drm_*_reference() and drm_*_unreference() functions are just
> > compatibility alias for drm_*_get() and drm_*_put() adn should not be
> 
> s/adn/and/
> > used by new code. So convert all users of compatibility functions to use
> > the new APIs.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Cihangir Akturk <cakturk@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fb.c    | 2 +-
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_ioctl.c | 4 ++--
> >   2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fb.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fb.c
> > index 6f4cb46..d43dce9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fb.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fb.c
> > @@ -500,7 +500,7 @@ static int vmw_fb_kms_detach(struct vmw_fb_par *par,
> >   	}
> >   	if (cur_fb) {
> > -		drm_framebuffer_unreference(cur_fb);
> > +		drm_framebuffer_put(cur_fb);
> >   		par->set_fb = NULL;
> >   	}
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_ioctl.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_ioctl.c
> > index 5ec24fd..fd4a988 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_ioctl.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_ioctl.c
> > @@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ int vmw_present_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> >   out_no_surface:
> >   	ttm_read_unlock(&dev_priv->reservation_sem);
> >   out_no_ttm_lock:
> > -	drm_framebuffer_unreference(fb);
> > +	drm_framebuffer_put(fb);
> >   out_no_fb:
> >   	drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev);
> >   out_no_copy:
> > @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ int vmw_present_readback_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> >   	ttm_read_unlock(&dev_priv->reservation_sem);
> >   out_no_ttm_lock:
> > -	drm_framebuffer_unreference(fb);
> > +	drm_framebuffer_put(fb);
> >   out_no_fb:
> >   	drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev);
> >   out_no_copy:
> 
> Apart from the above,
> 
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> (Assuming this gets pulled together with the whole series, not vmwgfx-next)

Imo easier to pull this  in through driver trees. It's going to take a bit
until we can finally remove the wrappers, there's too many callers all
around.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch