Re: [PATCH 095/102] watchdog: rt2880: explicitly request exclusive reset control

From: Guenter Roeck
Date: Wed Jul 19 2017 - 13:36:14 EST


On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 05:26:39PM +0200, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Commit a53e35db70d1 ("reset: Ensure drivers are explicit when requesting
> reset lines") started to transition the reset control request API calls
> to explicitly state whether the driver needs exclusive or shared reset
> control behavior. Convert all drivers requesting exclusive resets to the
> explicit API call so the temporary transition helpers can be removed.
>
> No functional changes.
>
> Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-watchdog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
> drivers/watchdog/rt2880_wdt.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/rt2880_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/rt2880_wdt.c
> index 05524baf7dccb..0d481a63cab14 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/rt2880_wdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/rt2880_wdt.c
> @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ static int rt288x_wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (IS_ERR(rt288x_wdt_clk))
> return PTR_ERR(rt288x_wdt_clk);
>
> - rt288x_wdt_reset = devm_reset_control_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> + rt288x_wdt_reset = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> if (!IS_ERR(rt288x_wdt_reset))
> reset_control_deassert(rt288x_wdt_reset);
>
> --
> 2.11.0
>