Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] mtd: handle partitioning on devices with 0 erasesize

[Chris Packham]

Hi,

On 02/06/17 15:21, Chris Packham wrote:
> erasesize is meaningful for flash devices but for SRAM there is no
> concept of an erase block so erasesize is set to 0. When partitioning
> these devices instead of ensuring partitions fall on erasesize
> boundaries we ensure they fall on writesize boundaries.
> 
> Helped-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

I had someone mention to me in passing that mtdinfo was failing for them 
(crashing with some floating point error). I'm wondering if we've 
created a divide-by-zero problem by reporting 0 erase size in /proc/mtd. 
I don't have any other info and right now I don't have access to the 
system I had with the mchp23lcv1024 sram.

Andrew, do you still have access to your device?