Re: [patch 1/5] pinctrl: samsung: Remove bogus irq_[un]mask from resource management

From: Linus Walleij
Date: Fri Jun 30 2017 - 08:15:26 EST


On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 11:33 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The irq chip callbacks irq_request/release_resources() have absolutely no
> business with masking and unmasking the irq.
>
> The core code unmasks the interrupt after complete setup and masks it
> before invoking irq_release_resources().
>
> The unmask is actually harmful as it happens before the interrupt is
> completely initialized in __setup_irq().
>
> Remove it.
>
> Fixes: f6a8249f9e55 ("pinctrl: exynos: Lock GPIOs as interrupts when used as EINTs")
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>

Does this patch have a dependency on the rest of the series or should
I just apply it as-is?

Yours,
Linus Walleij