Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Find transition latency dynamically

[Viresh Kumar]

On 29-06-17, 22:34, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Shouldn't drivers do that really?

Well they can, but the we will have some sort of code duplication
then. Or else we can provide a helper for them to find this value
dynamically and that would be fine too. And maybe we can add a
callback for the cpufreq-driver, which can be filled by the generic
helper and core can call it once at policy initialization time.

-- 
viresh