Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 7 (arch/x86/mm/tlb.c: events)

From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Wed Jun 21 2017 - 20:36:10 EST


Hi Randy,

On Wed, 7 Jun 2017 09:26:26 -0700 Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> on i386:
>
> CC arch/x86/mm/tlb.o
> In file included from ../include/linux/mm.h:1032:0,
> from ../arch/x86/mm/tlb.c:3:
> ../arch/x86/mm/tlb.c: In function 'flush_tlb_func_remote':
> ../arch/x86/mm/tlb.c:251:21: error: 'NR_TLB_REMOTE_FLUSH_RECEIVED' undeclared (first use in this function)
> count_vm_tlb_event(NR_TLB_REMOTE_FLUSH_RECEIVED);
> ^
> ../include/linux/vmstat.h:90:49: note: in definition of macro 'count_vm_tlb_event'
> #define count_vm_tlb_event(x) count_vm_event(x)
> ^
> ../arch/x86/mm/tlb.c:251:21: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> count_vm_tlb_event(NR_TLB_REMOTE_FLUSH_RECEIVED);
> ^
> ../include/linux/vmstat.h:90:49: note: in definition of macro 'count_vm_tlb_event'
> #define count_vm_tlb_event(x) count_vm_event(x)
> ^
> ../arch/x86/mm/tlb.c: In function 'native_flush_tlb_others':
> ../arch/x86/mm/tlb.c:258:21: error: 'NR_TLB_REMOTE_FLUSH' undeclared (first use in this function)
> count_vm_tlb_event(NR_TLB_REMOTE_FLUSH);
> ^
> ../include/linux/vmstat.h:90:49: note: in definition of macro 'count_vm_tlb_event'
> #define count_vm_tlb_event(x) count_vm_event(x)
> ^
> ../arch/x86/mm/tlb.c: In function 'do_flush_tlb_all':
> ../arch/x86/mm/tlb.c:326:21: error: 'NR_TLB_REMOTE_FLUSH_RECEIVED' undeclared (first use in this function)
> count_vm_tlb_event(NR_TLB_REMOTE_FLUSH_RECEIVED);
> ^
> ../include/linux/vmstat.h:90:49: note: in definition of macro 'count_vm_tlb_event'
> #define count_vm_tlb_event(x) count_vm_event(x)
> ^
> ../arch/x86/mm/tlb.c: In function 'flush_tlb_all':
> ../arch/x86/mm/tlb.c:334:21: error: 'NR_TLB_REMOTE_FLUSH' undeclared (first use in this function)
> count_vm_tlb_event(NR_TLB_REMOTE_FLUSH);
> ^
> ../include/linux/vmstat.h:90:49: note: in definition of macro 'count_vm_tlb_event'
> #define count_vm_tlb_event(x) count_vm_event(x)

Do you know if this has been fixed?

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell