Re: [patch 32/55] x86/irq: Restructure fixup_irqs()

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Tue, 20 Jun 2017, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 01:37:32AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > @@ -441,18 +440,27 @@ void fixup_irqs(void)
> >  
> >  	for_each_irq_desc(irq, desc) {
> >  		const struct cpumask *affinity;
> > -		int break_affinity = 0;
> > -		int set_affinity = 1;
> > +		bool break_affinity = false;
> >  
> >  		if (!desc)
> >  			continue;
> > -		if (irq == 2)
> > -			continue;
> >  
> >  		/* interrupt's are disabled at this point */
> >  		raw_spin_lock(&desc->lock);
> >  
> >  		data = irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc);
> > +		chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip(data);
> > +		/*
> > +		 * The interrupt descriptor might have been cleaned up
> > +		 * already, but it is not yet removed from the radix
> > +		 * tree. If the chip does not have an affinity setter,
> > +		 * nothing to do here.
> > +		 */
> > +		if (!chip !chip->irq_set_affinity) {
> > +			raw_spin_unlock(&desc->lock);
> > +			continue;
> > +		}
> 
> A bit of a moot point since the very next patch deletes all of this,
> but found this broken 'if' condition when compiling one at a time,
> missing the '&&'.

Hmm, How did I fatfinger that one after booting it?

Yes, the patch is kinda moot, but I wanted to verify that shifting the
logic around does not break any of the hotplug stress tests, so that the
next step becomes less risky.

Thanks,

	tglx