Re: [PATCH 0/4] bpf: Changes needed (or desired) for MIPS support

[David Miller]

From: David Daney <ddaney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 08:54:03 -0700

> On 06/13/2017 05:22 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>> On 06/14/2017 01:49 AM, David Daney wrote:
>>> This is a grab bag of changes to the bpf testing infrastructure I
>>> developed working on MIPS eBPF JIT support.  The change to
>>> bpf_jit_disasm is probably universally beneficial, the others are more
>>> MIPS specific.
>> I think these could go independently through net-next tree?
> 
> Yes, if davem is happy with them, I think that makes sense that he
> take them via net-next.

Series applied to net-next, thanks!