Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] scheduler tinification

[Nicolas Pitre]

On Tue, 13 Jun 2017, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> > I simply moved some code to different source files and not including 
> > those source files in the final build. That keeps the number of #ifdef's 
> > to a minimum but it makes a big diffstat due to the code movement.
> 
> So I'm fine with most of the code movement - let's try this series without any of 
> the more controversial bits which should make future arguments easier.

You should then be able to merge patches #1 to #5 already (you already 
have #2) as the more controversial ones are at the end.


Nicolas