Re: stable-rc/linux-4.4.y build: 199 builds: 13 failed, 186 passed, 13 errors, 4 warnings (v4.4.71-63-g409ebd600970)

[gregkh]

On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 01:28:48PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> [+cc GregKH]
> 
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 12:59 PM, kernelci.org bot <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> stable-rc/linux-4.4.y build: 199 builds: 13 failed, 186 passed, 13 errors, 4 warnings (v4.4.71-63-g409ebd600970)
> >>
> >>
> >> arm:    gcc version 5.3.1 20160412 (Linaro GCC 5.3-2016.05)
> >>
> >>     ep93xx_defconfig: 1 error
> >>
> >> mips:    gcc version 6.3.0 (GCC)
> >>
> >>     decstation_defconfig: 1 error
> >>     defconfig+CONFIG_LKDTM=y: 1 error
> >>     ip22_defconfig: 1 error
> >>     jazz_defconfig: 1 error
> >>     malta_defconfig: 1 error
> >>     malta_kvm_defconfig: 1 error
> >>     malta_kvm_guest_defconfig: 1 error
> >>     maltaup_xpa_defconfig: 1 error
> >>     nlm_xlp_defconfig: 1 error
> >>     nlm_xlr_defconfig: 1 error
> >>     rm200_defconfig: 1 error
> >>
> >> Errors summary:
> >>
> >>      12  fs/ufs/balloc.c:501:26: error: implicit declaration of function 'i_blocksize' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> >
> > Same as stable-rc/linux-4.9.y, this needs a backport of 93407472a21b ("fs: add
> > i_blocksize()")

This is now fixed.

> >>       1  drivers/dma/ep93xx_dma.c:1357:9: error: 'struct dma_device' has no member named 'device_synchronize'
> >
> > The error was introudced by the backport of 98f9de366fcc ("dmaengine: ep93xx:
> > Don't drain the transfers in terminate_all()"), which requires the dmaengine
> > synchronize callback.
> >
> > device_synchronize was introduced by b36f09c3c441 ("dmaengine: Add transfer
> > termination synchronization support") in linux-4.5. That is not a
> > bugfix but would
> > cleanly apply on top of 4.4 and has no dependencies or side-effects.
> >
> > We can either revert 98f9de366fcc or backport b36f09c3c441.

I'll just go drop 98f9de366fcc as that's best here.  I don't think
anyone really cares about this driver in 4.4, and if they do, then they
can speak up :)

thanks,

greg k-h