Re: [PATCH 2/2] include: warn for inconsistent endian config definition

From: Babu Moger
Date: Fri Jun 09 2017 - 09:57:12 EST


Geert,

On 6/9/2017 2:16 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Hi Babu,

On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 9:05 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Here is the original discussion
http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg178101.html

Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@xxxxxxxxxx>
Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
Hmm, the link above refers to a mail from me? ;-)
Please ignore that comment. I accidentally copied one line too much
from the other reply.

Yes. Got it. So patch #1 is fine. But, patch #2 might cause regressions. Should I drop patch 2.


Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds