Re: [PATCH 11/16] powerpc: vio_cmo: use dev_groups and not dev_attrs for bus_type

From: Michael Ellerman
Date: Thu Jun 08 2017 - 18:53:31 EST


Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 11:12:10PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>> > The dev_attrs field has long been "depreciated" and is finally being
>> > removed, so move the driver to use the "correct" dev_groups field
>> > instead for struct bus_type.
>> >
>> > Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > Cc: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>
>> > Cc: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@xxxxxxx>
>> > Cc: Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> > Cc: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> > Cc: <linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > ---
>> > arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/vio.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>> > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>
>> This one needed a bit more work to get building, the incremental diff is
>> below. We need a forward declaration of name, devspec and modalias,
>> which is a bit weird, but that's how the code is currently structured.
>> And there's dev and bus attributes with the same name, so that needed an
>> added "bus".
>>
>> I booted v2 of patch 10 and this one and everything looks identical to
>> upstream.
>
> Ah, many thanks, this was on my todo list to fix up today.
>
> But you renamed the sysfs files when you added "bus" to the function
> names, are you sure you want to do that? I don't mind, but if you
> happen to have userspace tools that look at those files, they just broke
> :(

Ugh crap, no that won't work.

I didn't see it when I tested because my machine doesn't have the CMO
feature enabled.

I guess we have to open code some of the BUS_ATTR_RO() etc. so we can
avoid the name clash.

I'll try and get it fixed later today.

cheers