Re: [PATCH RT] sched: Prevent task state corruption by spurious lock wakeup

From: Thomas Gleixner
Date: Sat Jun 03 2017 - 03:47:13 EST


On Fri, 2 Jun 2017, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

> Mathias and some others reported GDB failures on RT.
>
> The following scenario leads to task state corruption:
>
> CPU0 CPU1
>
> T1->state = TASK_XXX;
> spin_lock(&lock)
> rt_spin_lock_slowlock(&lock->rtmutex)
> raw_spin_lock(&rtm->wait_lock);
> T1->saved_state = current->state;
> T1->state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE;
> spin_unlock(&lock)
> task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(rtm) rt_spin_lock_slowunlock(&lock->rtmutex)
> queue_waiter(rtm) raw_spin_lock(&rtm->wait_lock);
> pi_chain_walk(rtm)
> raw_spin_unlock(&rtm->wait_lock);
> mark_top_waiter_for_wakeup(T1)
> raw_spin_unlock(&rtm->wait_lock);
> raw_spin_lock(&rtm->wait_lock);
> wake_up_top_waiter()
>
> for (;;) {
> if (__try_to_take_rt_mutex()) <- Succeeds
> break;
> ...
> }
> try_to_wake_up(T1)
> T1->state = T1->saved_state;
> ==> T1->state == TASK_XXX
> ttwu_do_wakeup(T1)
> FAIL ----> T1->state = TASK_RUNNING;
>
>
> In most cases this is harmless because waiting for some event, which is the
> usual reason for TASK_[UN]INTERRUPTIBLE, has to be safe against other forms
> of spurious wakeups anyway.
>
> But in case of TASK_TRACED this is actually fatal, because the task loses
> the TASK_TRACED state. In consequence it fails to consume SIGSTOP which was
> sent from the debugger and actually delivers SIGSTOP to the task which
> breaks the ptrace mechanics and brings the debugger into an unexpected
> state.
>
> The cure is way simpler as figuring it out:
>
> In a lock wakeup, check whether the task is actually blocked on a lock. If
> yes, deliver it. If not, consider the wakeup spurious and exit the wake up
> code without touching tasks state.

After recovering from heat and ptrace induced brain melt, I have to say
that the fix is actually working, but it's not fixing the root cause of the
problem.

If the to be woken task has state TASK_TRACED then the wakeup state check
should not match. But for some stupid reason wake_up_lock_sleeper() should
not use TASK_ALL. The lock sleepers are in state UNINTERRUPTIBLE, so the
wake state should be UNINTERRUPTIBLE as well.

The extra check in try_to_wake_up() should stay though as it prevents
spurious wake ups in general.

Delta patch below.

Thanks,

tglx

8<------------------
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -2220,7 +2220,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(wake_up_process);
*/
int wake_up_lock_sleeper(struct task_struct *p)
{
- return try_to_wake_up(p, TASK_ALL, WF_LOCK_SLEEPER);
+ return try_to_wake_up(p, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, WF_LOCK_SLEEPER);
}

int wake_up_state(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state)