Re: linux-next: Tree for May 31

[Michael Ellerman]

Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Changes since 20170530:
>>
>> The mfd tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
>> next-20170530.
>>
>> The drivers-x86 tree gained the same build failure as the mfd tree so
>> I used the version from next-20170530.
>>
>> The rtc tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
>> next-20170530.
>>
>> The akpm tree lost a patch that turned up elsewhere.
>>
>> Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 3325
>>  3598 files changed, 135000 insertions(+), 72065 deletions(-)
>
> More or less all my powerpc boxes failed to boot this.
>
> All the stack traces point to new_slab():
>
>   PID hash table entries: 4096 (order: -1, 32768 bytes)
>   Memory: 127012480K/134217728K available (12032K kernel code, 1920K rwdata, 2916K rodata, 1088K init, 14065K bss, 487808K reserved, 6717440K cma-reserved)
>   Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at address 0x000004f0
>   Faulting instruction address: 0xc00000000033fd48
>   Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
>   SMP NR_CPUS=2048 
>   NUMA 
>   PowerNV
>   Modules linked in:
>   CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 4.12.0-rc3-gccN-next-20170531-gf2882f4 #1
>   task: c000000000fb1200 task.stack: c000000001104000
>   NIP: c00000000033fd48 LR: c00000000033fb1c CTR: c0000000002d6ae0
>   REGS: c000000001107970 TRAP: 0380   Not tainted  (4.12.0-rc3-gccN-next-20170531-gf2882f4)
>   MSR: 9000000002001033 <SF,HV,VEC,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE>
>     CR: 22042244  XER: 00000000
>   CFAR: c00000000033fbfc SOFTE: 0 
>   GPR00: c00000000033fb1c c000000001107bf0 c000000001108b00 c0000007ffff6180 
>   GPR04: c000000001139600 0000000000000000 00000007f9880000 0000000000000080 
>   GPR08: c0000000011cf5d8 00000000000004f0 0000000000000000 c0000007ffff6280 
>   GPR12: 0000000028042822 c00000000fd40000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 
>   GPR16: 0000000000000000 c000000000dc9198 c000000000dc91c8 000000000000006f 
>   GPR20: 0000000000000001 0000000000002000 00000000014000c0 0000000000000000 
>   GPR24: 0000000000000201 c0000007f9010000 0000000000000000 0000000080010400 
>   GPR28: 0000000000000001 0000000000000006 f000000001fe4000 c000000000f15958 
>   NIP [c00000000033fd48] new_slab+0x318/0x710
>   LR [c00000000033fb1c] new_slab+0xec/0x710
>   Call Trace:
>   [c000000001107bf0] [c00000000033fb1c] new_slab+0xec/0x710 (unreliable)
>   [c000000001107cc0] [c000000000348cc0] __kmem_cache_create+0x270/0x800
>   [c000000001107df0] [c000000000ece8b4] create_boot_cache+0xa0/0xe4
>   [c000000001107e70] [c000000000ed30d0] kmem_cache_init+0x68/0x16c
>   [c000000001107f00] [c000000000ea0b08] start_kernel+0x2a0/0x554
>   [c000000001107f90] [c00000000000ad70] start_here_common+0x1c/0x4ac
>   Instruction dump:
>   57bd039c 79291f24 7fbd0074 7c68482a 7bbdd182 3bbd0005 60000000 3d230001 
>   e95e0038 e9299a7a 3929009e 79291f24 <7f6a482a> e93b0080 7fa34800 409e036c 
>   ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
>   
>   Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill the idle task!
>   Rebooting in 10 seconds..

Bisect says:

commit b6bc6724488ac9a149f4ee50d9f036b0fe2420c5
Author: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Wed May 31 09:17:23 2017 +1000

    mm: vmstat: move slab statistics from zone to node counters
    
    Patch series "mm: per-lruvec slab stats"
    
    Josef is working on a new approach to balancing slab caches and the page
    cache.  For this to work, he needs slab cache statistics on the lruvec
    level.  These patches implement that by adding infrastructure that allows
    updating and reading generic VM stat items per lruvec, then switches some
    existing VM accounting sites, including the slab accounting ones, to this
    new cgroup-aware API.
    
    I'll follow up with more patches on this, because there is actually
    substantial simplification that can be done to the memory controller when
    we replace private memcg accounting with making the existing VM accounting
    sites cgroup-aware.  But this is enough for Josef to base his slab reclaim
    work on, so here goes.
    
    This patch (of 5):
    
    To re-implement slab cache vs.  page cache balancing, we'll need the slab
    counters at the lruvec level, which, ever since lru reclaim was moved from
    the zone to the node, is the intersection of the node, not the zone, and
    the memcg.
    
    We could retain the per-zone counters for when the page allocator dumps
    its memory information on failures, and have counters on both levels -
    which on all but NUMA node 0 is usually redundant.  But let's keep it
    simple for now and just move them.  If anybody complains we can restore
    the per-zone counters.
    
    Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170530181724.27197-3-hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx
    Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
    Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
    Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@xxxxxxxxx>
    Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

 drivers/base/node.c    | 10 +++++-----
 include/linux/mmzone.h |  4 ++--
 mm/page_alloc.c        |  4 ----
 mm/slab.c              |  8 ++++----
 mm/slub.c              |  4 ++--
 mm/vmscan.c            |  2 +-
 mm/vmstat.c            |  4 ++--
 7 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)


cheers