Re: [PATCH] PCI: endpoint: PCI_ENDPOINT should depend on HAS_DMA

From: Geert Uytterhoeven
Date: Tue May 23 2017 - 03:12:28 EST


Hi Kishon,

On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 8:43 AM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 May 2017 02:56 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 07:21:08PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> If NO_DMA=y:
>>>
>>> drivers/built-in.o: In function `__pci_epc_create':
>>> (.text+0xef4e): undefined reference to `bad_dma_ops'
>>> drivers/built-in.o: In function `pci_epc_add_epf':
>>> (.text+0xf676): undefined reference to `bad_dma_ops'
>>> drivers/built-in.o: In function `pci_epf_alloc_space':
>>> (.text+0xfa32): undefined reference to `bad_dma_ops'
>>> drivers/built-in.o: In function `pci_epf_free_space':
>>> (.text+0xfac4): undefined reference to `bad_dma_ops'
>>>
>>> Add a dependency on HAS_DMA to fix this.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Applied to for-linus for v4.12, thanks!
>>
>>> ---
>>> Should PCI_ENDPOINT depend on CONFIG_PCI instead?
>>
>> I *think* we want HAS_DMA, not CONFIG_PCI, because CONFIG_PCI means we
>> want the infrastructure for PCI host bridges, enumerating children of
>> the bridges, etc. I think we want to allow PCI_ENDPOINT without all
>> that.
>>
>> Kishon?
>
> right. CONFIG_PCI is for enabling the host infrastructure and PCI_ENDPOINT and
> CONFIG_PCI should be completely independent of each other.

OK, so HAS_DMA is the right dependency.
Thanks for confirming!

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds