[PATCH 3/4] KVM: x86: drop bogus MWAIT check

From: Radim KrÄmÃÅ
Date: Wed May 03 2017 - 15:39:05 EST


The guest can call MWAIT with ECX = 0 even if we enforce
CPUID5_ECX_INTERRUPT_BREAK; the call would have the exactly the same
effect as if the host didn't have CPUID5_ECX_INTERRUPT_BREAK.

The check was added in some iteration while trying to fix a reported
OS X on Core 2 bug, but the CPU had CPUID5_ECX_INTERRUPT_BREAK and the
bug is elsewhere.

Signed-off-by: Radim KrÄmÃÅ <rkrcmar@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/kvm/x86.h | 23 +----------------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
index 63d5fb65ea30..8ea4e80c24d1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
@@ -216,8 +216,6 @@ static inline u64 nsec_to_cycles(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 nsec)

static inline bool kvm_mwait_in_guest(void)
{
- unsigned int eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
-
if (!cpu_has(&boot_cpu_data, X86_FEATURE_MWAIT))
return false;

@@ -225,29 +223,10 @@ static inline bool kvm_mwait_in_guest(void)
case X86_VENDOR_AMD:
return !boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_AMD_E400);
case X86_VENDOR_INTEL:
- /* Handle Intel below */
- break;
+ return !boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_MONITOR);
default:
return false;
}
-
- if (boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_MONITOR))
- return false;
-
- /*
- * Intel CPUs without CPUID5_ECX_INTERRUPT_BREAK are problematic as
- * they would allow guest to stop the CPU completely by disabling
- * interrupts then invoking MWAIT.
- */
- if (boot_cpu_data.cpuid_level < CPUID_MWAIT_LEAF)
- return false;
-
- cpuid(CPUID_MWAIT_LEAF, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
-
- if (!(ecx & CPUID5_ECX_INTERRUPT_BREAK))
- return false;
-
- return true;
}

#endif
--
2.12.2