Re: [RFC 2/4] Deactivate mmap_sem assert

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Wed Apr 19 2017 - 08:31:16 EST

Next message: Gerd Hoffmann: "Re: [RfC PATCH] drm: fourcc byteorder: brings header file comments in line with reality."
Previous message: Matt Redfearn: "[PATCH 1/2] MIPS: Malta: Probe gic-timer via devicetree"
In reply to: Laurent Dufour: "[RFC 2/4] Deactivate mmap_sem assert"
Next in thread: Laurent Dufour: "Re: [RFC 2/4] Deactivate mmap_sem assert"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 02:18:25PM +0200, Laurent Dufour wrote:
> When mmap_sem will be moved to a range lock, some assertion done in
> the code are no more valid, like the one ensuring mmap_sem is held.
>

Why are they no longer valid?

Next message: Gerd Hoffmann: "Re: [RfC PATCH] drm: fourcc byteorder: brings header file comments in line with reality."
Previous message: Matt Redfearn: "[PATCH 1/2] MIPS: Malta: Probe gic-timer via devicetree"
In reply to: Laurent Dufour: "[RFC 2/4] Deactivate mmap_sem assert"
Next in thread: Laurent Dufour: "Re: [RFC 2/4] Deactivate mmap_sem assert"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]