Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with Linus' tree

From: David Miller
Date: Thu Mar 23 2017 - 20:10:47 EST


From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 11:05:14 +1100

> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:
>
> kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 8c290e60fa2a ("bpf: fix hashmap extra_elems logic")
>
> from Linus' tree and commit:
>
> bcc6b1b7ebf8 ("bpf: Add hash of maps support")
>
> from the net-next tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

I did the same resolution just an hour ago when merging net into
net-next.

Thanks!