Re: [PATCH 4.10 00/21] 4.10.1-stable review

[Kevin Hilman]

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10:09:22AM -0800, kernelci.org bot wrote:
>> stable-rc boot: 191 boots: 2 failed, 181 passed with 8 offline (v4.10-22-g0b3f6c4ba776)
>> 
>> Full Boot Summary: https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-rc/kernel/v4.10-22-g0b3f6c4ba776/
>> Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/stable-rc/kernel/v4.10-22-g0b3f6c4ba776/
>> 
>> Tree: stable-rc
>> Branch: local/linux-4.10.y
>> Git Describe: v4.10-22-g0b3f6c4ba776
>> Git Commit: 0b3f6c4ba776c7c49564681a3b0be953cce243e3
>> Git URL: http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
>> Tested: 47 unique boards, 16 SoC families, 24 builds out of 206
>> 
>> Boot Failures Detected:
>> 
>> arm64:
>> 
>>     defconfig+CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE=y
>>         apm-mustang: 1 failed lab
>>         juno: 1 failed lab
>
> Is this failure new?

It's new, but not unique to stable, also been happening in mainline for awhile:

    https://kernelci.org/boot/id/58b381fd59b51450d65e8e4f/

Not sure if anyone is looking into it though, as I'm just getting back
from some time off.

Kevin