Re: [PATCH] f2fs: change the codes of checking CP_CRC_RECOVERY_FLAG to macro

From: Yunlong Song
Date: Fri Feb 24 2017 - 06:58:25 EST


On 2017/2/24 19:37, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2017/2/24 19:11, Yunlong Song wrote:
>> I think we do not need to care about the CP_CRC_RECOVERY_FLAG status of old image, I mean we
>> do not need to check the already-been-written node footer in the image, what we care about is the
>> on-going-to-write node footer, which is used for recovery.
>>
>> If CP_CRC_RECOVERY_FLAG is defined, then __set_ckpt_flags(ckpt, CP_CRC_RECOVERY_FLAG); is
>> executed in each do_checkpoint actually, and CP will have that flag for each on-going-to-write node footer.
>> I think the recovery process only needs to use the on-going-to-write node rather than the already-been-written
>> node in the old image. The already-been-written node in the old image should not appear in the node
>> chain of recovery process, right?
> Previously, we changed the disk layout of footer in node block, and then we
> applied new verifying approach which has better reliability in order to avoid
> chaining garbage node block.
>
> In order to distinguish old disk layout and the new one, we introduce
> CP_CRC_RECOVERY_FLAG, once a CP is triggered, we will tag current CP with the
> flag, and use new disk layout and new verifying approach for the following node
> block updating flow and abnormal power-cut recovery flow.
>
> For old image which has no CP_CRC_RECOVERY_FLAG flag been set, f2fs needs to use
> old disk layout and old verifying approach during recovery for the
> compatibility. So that's why we need to check the flag in CP here.

For the old disk layout, because we still use new approach to set CP_CRC_RECOVERY_FLAG in the node footer in each do_checkpoint,
then I think f2fs should also use new verifying approach during recovery rather than old verifying approach. What is the problem if
we do like this?

> Thanks,
>
>> On 2017/2/24 18:29, Chao Yu wrote:
>>> On 2017/2/24 18:06, Yunlong Song wrote:
>>>> No need to check the "if" condition each time, just change it to macro codes.
>>> We're going to check flag in CP, not just in code of f2fs.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>> fs/f2fs/node.h | 20 ++++++++++----------
>>>> fs/f2fs/segment.c | 5 +++--
>>>> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.h b/fs/f2fs/node.h
>>>> index 3fc9c4b..3e5a58b 100644
>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.h
>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.h
>>>> @@ -303,11 +303,11 @@ static inline void fill_node_footer_blkaddr(struct page *page, block_t blkaddr)
>>>> size_t crc_offset = le32_to_cpu(ckpt->checksum_offset);
>>>> __u64 cp_ver = le64_to_cpu(ckpt->checkpoint_ver);
>>>>
>>>> - if (__is_set_ckpt_flags(ckpt, CP_CRC_RECOVERY_FLAG)) {
>>>> - __u64 crc = le32_to_cpu(*((__le32 *)
>>>> - ((unsigned char *)ckpt + crc_offset)));
>>>> - cp_ver |= (crc << 32);
>>>> - }
>>>> +#ifdef CP_CRC_RECOVERY_FLAG
>>>> + __u64 crc = le32_to_cpu(*((__le32 *)
>>>> + ((unsigned char *)ckpt + crc_offset)));
>>>> + cp_ver |= (crc << 32);
>>>> +#endif
>>>> rn->footer.cp_ver = cpu_to_le64(cp_ver);
>>>> rn->footer.next_blkaddr = cpu_to_le32(blkaddr);
>>>> }
>>>> @@ -318,11 +318,11 @@ static inline bool is_recoverable_dnode(struct page *page)
>>>> size_t crc_offset = le32_to_cpu(ckpt->checksum_offset);
>>>> __u64 cp_ver = cur_cp_version(ckpt);
>>>>
>>>> - if (__is_set_ckpt_flags(ckpt, CP_CRC_RECOVERY_FLAG)) {
>>>> - __u64 crc = le32_to_cpu(*((__le32 *)
>>>> - ((unsigned char *)ckpt + crc_offset)));
>>>> - cp_ver |= (crc << 32);
>>>> - }
>>>> +#ifdef CP_CRC_RECOVERY_FLAG
>>>> + __u64 crc = le32_to_cpu(*((__le32 *)
>>>> + ((unsigned char *)ckpt + crc_offset)));
>>>> + cp_ver |= (crc << 32);
>>>> +#endif
>>>> return cp_ver == cpver_of_node(page);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
>>>> index 9eb6d89..6c2e1ee 100644
>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
>>>> @@ -1573,9 +1573,10 @@ static void allocate_segment_by_default(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>>>> {
>>>> if (force)
>>>> new_curseg(sbi, type, true);
>>>> - else if (!is_set_ckpt_flags(sbi, CP_CRC_RECOVERY_FLAG) &&
>>>> - type == CURSEG_WARM_NODE)
>>>> +#ifndef CP_CRC_RECOVERY_FLAG
>>>> + else if (type == CURSEG_WARM_NODE)
>>>> new_curseg(sbi, type, false);
>>>> +#endif
>>>> else if (need_SSR(sbi) && get_ssr_segment(sbi, type))
>>>> change_curseg(sbi, type, true);
>>>> else
>>>>
>>> .
>>>
>>
>
> .
>


--
Thanks,
Yunlong Song