Re: [PATCH v2 01/11] power: supplies: bq275xx: rename BQ27500 allow for deprecation in future.

[Sebastian Reichel]

Hi Chris,

On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 11:04:57AM +1100, Chris Lapa wrote:
> From: Chris Lapa <chris@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> The BQ275XX definition exists only to satisfy backwards compatibility.
> 
> tested: yes
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Lapa <chris@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> [...]
>
>  static bool bq27xxx_battery_overtemp(struct bq27xxx_device_info *di, u16 flags)
>  {
> -	if (di->chip == BQ27500 || di->chip == BQ27541 || di->chip == BQ27545)
> +	if (di->chip == BQ275XX || di->chip == BQ27541 || di->chip == BQ27545)
>  		return flags & (BQ27XXX_FLAG_OTC | BQ27XXX_FLAG_OTD);
>  	if (di->chip == BQ27530 || di->chip == BQ27421)
>  		return flags & BQ27XXX_FLAG_OT;

This is really getting out of hands in this patchset. Please
add a patch at the beginning of the patchset, which converts
this construct into the following:

switch (di->chip) {
case A:
case B:
case C:
case D:
    return flags & (BQ27XXX_FLAG_OTC | BQ27XXX_FLAG_OTD);
case E:
case F:
    return flags & BQ27XXX_FLAG_OT;
default:
    return false;
}

-- Sebastian

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature