Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/tools: Fix gcc-7 warning in relocs.c

From: Markus Trippelsdorf
Date: Tue Dec 20 2016 - 06:51:17 EST


On 2016.12.20 at 03:10 -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 12/20/16 02:00, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > On 2016.12.20 at 01:30 -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >> I'd strongly prefer a non-data-dependent solution, specifically adding
> >> at the top of sort_relocs():
> >>
> >> if (!r->count)
> >> return;
> >>
> >> However, by my reading of the C and POSIX standards, this is a gcc
> >> error: qsort() should do nothing if the count is zero.
> >
> > No, it is invoking undefined behavior.
>
> > Notice the nonnull attribute in /usr/include/stdlib.h:
> >
> > 739 /* Sort NMEMB elements of BASE, of SIZE bytes each,
> > 740 using COMPAR to perform the comparisons. */
> > 741 extern void qsort (void *__base, size_t __nmemb, size_t __size,
> > 742 __compar_fn_t __compar) __nonnull ((1, 4));
> >
> > But feel free to revert my patch and add your solution.
>
> Well, s/gcc/glibc/ then.
>
> > The qsort() function shall sort an array of nel objects, the
> > initial element of which is pointed to by base

NULL does not point to any object, therefore it is UB.

--
Markus