Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] mfd: dt: ranges, #address-cells and #size-cells as optional properties

[Andrew Jeffery]

On Fri, 2016-12-09 at 16:49 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 01:53:17PM +1100, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
> > Whilst describing a device and not a bus, simple-mfd is modelled on
> > simple-bus where child nodes are iterated and registered as platform
> > devices. Some complex devices, e.g. the Aspeed LPC controller, can
> > benefit from address space mapping such that child nodes can use the
> > regs property to describe their resources within the multi-function
> > device.
> > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@xxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > ÂDocumentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/mfd.txt | 10 ++++++++++
> > Â1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> 
> No objections to this, but this is all implied by having a reg property.

Thanks for clarifying. I wasn't sure so I wrote the patch with the
thought that we could drop it if it wasn't necessary. Regardless, I
think being explicit about the properties is nice.

> 
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks,

Andrew

> 
> Rob

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part