[PATCH] cpufreq: schedutil: Rectify comment in sugov_irq_work() function

From: Viresh Kumar
Date: Thu Nov 24 2016 - 03:21:57 EST


This patch rectifies a comment present in sugov_irq_work() function to
follow proper grammar.

Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
index 42a220e78f00..71e1a980d40a 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
@@ -315,15 +315,15 @@ static void sugov_irq_work(struct irq_work *irq_work)
sg_policy = container_of(irq_work, struct sugov_policy, irq_work);

/*
- * For Real Time and Deadline tasks, schedutil governor shoots the
- * frequency to maximum. And special care must be taken to ensure that
- * this kthread doesn't result in that.
+ * For Real Time and Deadline tasks, the schedutil governor shoots the
+ * frequency to maximum. Special care must be taken to ensure that this
+ * kthread doesn't result in the same behavior.
*
* This is (mostly) guaranteed by the work_in_progress flag. The flag is
- * updated only at the end of the sugov_work() and before that schedutil
- * rejects all other frequency scaling requests.
+ * updated only at the end of the sugov_work() function and before that
+ * the schedutil governor rejects all other frequency scaling requests.
*
- * Though there is a very rare case where the RT thread yields right
+ * There is a very rare case though, where the RT thread yields right
* after the work_in_progress flag is cleared. The effects of that are
* neglected for now.
*/
--
2.7.1.410.g6faf27b