Re: [PATCH] clk: Free struct clk allocated during clk_hw_register()

From: Geert Uytterhoeven
Date: Tue Nov 08 2016 - 04:36:59 EST


Hi Rajendra,

On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 9:23 AM, Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> With clk_hw_register() API we hide the struct clk from the caller
> and return an int error code instead, so the caller (clk provider)
> is not expected to use hw->clk on return.

That's correct, in case of failure.

> Free the memory, and mark hw->clk as NULL before returning.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/clk/clk.c | 10 +++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> index 0fb39fe..f81e4aa 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> @@ -2628,7 +2628,15 @@ struct clk *clk_register(struct device *dev, struct clk_hw *hw)
> */
> int clk_hw_register(struct device *dev, struct clk_hw *hw)
> {
> - return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(clk_register(dev, hw));
> + struct clk *c;
> +
> + c = clk_register(dev, hw);
> + if (IS_ERR(c))
> + return PTR_ERR(c);
> +
> + __clk_free_clk(c);
> + hw->clk = NULL;

This is the success path, not the failure path (on failure, clk_register()
has already freed the struct clk).
Why do you free the struct clk in case of success?

What am I missing?

> + return 0;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_hw_register);

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds