Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] ahci: imx: Add imx53 SATA temperature sensor support

From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Date: Fri Oct 21 2016 - 06:57:16 EST



Hi,

On Friday, October 21, 2016 09:26:08 AM Fabien Lahoudere wrote:
> From: Csaba Kertesz <csaba.kertesz@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Add a hwmon entry to get the temperature from the die of imx53
> SATA.
>
> The original patch was made by Richard Zhu for kernel 2.6.x:
> ENGR00134041-MX53-Add-the-SATA-AHCI-temperature-monitor.patch
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabien Lahoudere <fabien.lahoudere@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/ata/ahci_imx.c | 225 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 225 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci_imx.c b/drivers/ata/ahci_imx.c
> index 3f3a7db..a2a8c63 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/ahci_imx.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/ahci_imx.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,9 @@
> #include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
> #include <linux/mfd/syscon/imx6q-iomuxc-gpr.h>
> #include <linux/libata.h>
> +#include <linux/hwmon.h>
> +#include <linux/hwmon-sysfs.h>
> +#include <linux/thermal.h>
> #include "ahci.h"
>
> #define DRV_NAME "ahci-imx"
> @@ -214,6 +217,210 @@ static int imx_sata_phy_reset(struct ahci_host_priv *hpriv)
> return timeout ? 0 : -ETIMEDOUT;
> }
>
> +enum {
> + /* SATA PHY Register */
> + SATA_PHY_CR_CLOCK_CRCMP_LT_LIMIT = 0x0001,
> + SATA_PHY_CR_CLOCK_DAC_CTL = 0x0008,
> + SATA_PHY_CR_CLOCK_RTUNE_CTL = 0x0009,
> + SATA_PHY_CR_CLOCK_ADC_OUT = 0x000A,
> + SATA_PHY_CR_CLOCK_MPLL_TST = 0x0017,
> +};
> +
> +/* SATA AHCI temperature monitor */
> +static int sata_ahci_read_temperature(void *dev, int *temp)
> +{
> + u16 mpll_test_reg, rtune_ctl_reg, dac_ctl_reg, adc_out_reg, read_sum;
> + u32 str1, str2, str3, str4, index, read_attempt;
> + const u32 attempt_limit = 100;
> + int m1, m2, a;
> + struct ahci_host_priv *hpriv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + void __iomem *mmio = hpriv->mmio;
> +
> + /* check rd-wr to reg */
> + read_sum = 0;
> + imx_phy_reg_addressing(SATA_PHY_CR_CLOCK_CRCMP_LT_LIMIT, mmio);
> + imx_phy_reg_write(read_sum, mmio);
> + imx_phy_reg_read(&read_sum, mmio);
> + if ((read_sum & 0xffff) != 0)
> + dev_err(dev, "Read/Write REG error, 0x%x!\n", read_sum);
> +
> + imx_phy_reg_write(0x5A5A, mmio);
> + imx_phy_reg_read(&read_sum, mmio);
> + if ((read_sum & 0xffff) != 0x5A5A)
> + dev_err(dev, "Read/Write REG error, 0x%x!\n", read_sum);
> +
> + imx_phy_reg_write(0x1234, mmio);
> + imx_phy_reg_read(&read_sum, mmio);
> + if ((read_sum & 0xffff) != 0x1234)
> + dev_err(dev, "Read/Write REG error, 0x%x!\n", read_sum);
> +
> + /* start temperature test */
> + imx_phy_reg_addressing(SATA_PHY_CR_CLOCK_MPLL_TST, mmio);
> + imx_phy_reg_read(&mpll_test_reg, mmio);
> + imx_phy_reg_addressing(SATA_PHY_CR_CLOCK_RTUNE_CTL, mmio);
> + imx_phy_reg_read(&rtune_ctl_reg, mmio);
> + imx_phy_reg_addressing(SATA_PHY_CR_CLOCK_DAC_CTL, mmio);
> + imx_phy_reg_read(&dac_ctl_reg, mmio);
> +
> + /* mpll_tst.meas_iv ([12:2]) */
> + str1 = (mpll_test_reg >> 2) & 0x7FF;
> + /* rtune_ctl.mode ([1:0]) */
> + str2 = (rtune_ctl_reg) & 0x3;
> + /* dac_ctl.dac_mode ([14:12]) */
> + str3 = (dac_ctl_reg >> 12) & 0x7;
> + /* rtune_ctl.sel_atbp ([4]) */
> + str4 = (rtune_ctl_reg >> 4);
> +
> + /* Calculate the m1 */
> + /* mpll_tst.meas_iv */
> + mpll_test_reg = (mpll_test_reg & 0xE03) | (512) << 2;
> + /* rtune_ctl.mode */
> + rtune_ctl_reg = (rtune_ctl_reg & 0xFFC) | (1);
> + /* dac_ctl.dac_mode */
> + dac_ctl_reg = (dac_ctl_reg & 0x8FF) | (4) << 12;
> + /* rtune_ctl.sel_atbp */
> + rtune_ctl_reg = (rtune_ctl_reg & 0xFEF) | (0) << 4;
> +
> + imx_phy_reg_addressing(SATA_PHY_CR_CLOCK_MPLL_TST, mmio);
> + imx_phy_reg_write(mpll_test_reg, mmio);
> + imx_phy_reg_addressing(SATA_PHY_CR_CLOCK_DAC_CTL, mmio);
> + imx_phy_reg_write(dac_ctl_reg, mmio);

The code below is duplicated later for obtaining m2.
It should be moved to a common helper function.

> + imx_phy_reg_addressing(SATA_PHY_CR_CLOCK_RTUNE_CTL, mmio);
> + imx_phy_reg_write(rtune_ctl_reg, mmio);
> +
> + /* two dummy read */
> + index = 0;
> + read_attempt = 0;
> + adc_out_reg = 0;
> + imx_phy_reg_addressing(SATA_PHY_CR_CLOCK_ADC_OUT, mmio);
> + while (index < 2) {
> + imx_phy_reg_read(&adc_out_reg, mmio);
> + /* check if valid */
> + if (adc_out_reg & 0x400)
> + index++;
> +
> + read_attempt++;
> + if (read_attempt > attempt_limit) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Read REG more than %d times!\n",
> + attempt_limit);
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + index = 0;
> + read_attempt = 0;
> + read_sum = 0;
> + while (index < 80) {
> + imx_phy_reg_read(&adc_out_reg, mmio);
> + if (adc_out_reg & 0x400) {
> + read_sum = read_sum + (adc_out_reg & 0x3FF);
> + index++;
> + }
> + read_attempt++;
> + if (read_attempt > attempt_limit) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Read REG more than %d times!\n",
> + attempt_limit);
> + break;
> + }
> + }

(end of duplicated code)

> + /* Use the U32 to make 1000 precision */
> + m1 = (read_sum * 1000) / 80;
> +
> + /* Calculate the m2 */
> + /* rtune_ctl.sel_atbp */
> + rtune_ctl_reg = (rtune_ctl_reg & 0xFEF) | (1) << 4;
> + imx_phy_reg_addressing(SATA_PHY_CR_CLOCK_RTUNE_CTL, mmio);
> + imx_phy_reg_write(rtune_ctl_reg, mmio);
> +
> + /* two dummy read */
> + index = 0;
> + read_attempt = 0;

adc_out_reg zeroing is missing here

> + imx_phy_reg_addressing(SATA_PHY_CR_CLOCK_ADC_OUT, mmio);
> + while (index < 2) {
> + imx_phy_reg_read(&adc_out_reg, mmio);
> + /* check if valid */
> + if (adc_out_reg & 0x400)
> + index++;
> +
> + read_attempt++;
> + if (read_attempt > attempt_limit) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Read REG more than %d times!\n",
> + attempt_limit);
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + index = 0;
> + read_attempt = 0;
> + read_sum = 0;
> + while (index < 80) {
> + imx_phy_reg_read(&adc_out_reg, mmio);
> + if (adc_out_reg & 0x400) {
> + read_sum = read_sum + (adc_out_reg & 0x3FF);
> + index++;
> + }
> + read_attempt++;
> + if (read_attempt > attempt_limit) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Read REG more than %d times!\n",
> + attempt_limit);
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + /* Use the U32 to make 1000 precision */
> + m2 = (read_sum * 1000) / 80;

The rest looks fine to me.

Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics