Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] powerpc: get hugetlbpage handling more generic

From: Christophe Leroy
Date: Tue Sep 20 2016 - 01:22:29 EST




Le 20/09/2016 Ã 04:28, Aneesh Kumar K.V a Ãcrit :
christophe leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxx> writes:

Le 19/09/2016 Ã 07:50, Aneesh Kumar K.V a Ãcrit :

Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxx> writes:
+#else
+static void hugepd_free(struct mmu_gather *tlb, void *hugepte)
+{
+ BUG();
+}
+
#endif


I was expecting that BUG will get removed in the next patch. But I don't
see it in the next patch. Considering

@@ -475,11 +453,10 @@ static void free_hugepd_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb, hugepd_t *hpdp, int pdshif
for (i = 0; i < num_hugepd; i++, hpdp++)
hpdp->pd = 0;

-#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_FSL_BOOK3E
- hugepd_free(tlb, hugepte);
-#else
- pgtable_free_tlb(tlb, hugepte, pdshift - shift);
-#endif
+ if (shift >= pdshift)
+ hugepd_free(tlb, hugepte);
+ else
+ pgtable_free_tlb(tlb, hugepte, pdshift - shift);
}

What is that I am missing ?


Previously, call to hugepd_free() was compiled only when #ifdef
CONFIG_PPC_FSL_BOOK3E
Now, it is compiled at all time, but it should never be called if not
CONFIG_PPC_FSL_BOOK3E because we always have shift < pdshift in that case.
Then the function needs to be defined anyway but should never be called.
Should I just define it static inline {} ?


For 8M with 4K mode, we have shift >= pdshift right ?


Yes, thats the reason why in the following patch we get. That way we get a real hugepd_free() also for the 8xx.

@@ -366,7 +373,7 @@ int alloc_bootmem_huge_page(struct hstate *hstate)
}
#endif

-#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_FSL_BOOK3E
+#if defined(CONFIG_PPC_FSL_BOOK3E) || defined(CONFIG_PPC_8xx)
#define HUGEPD_FREELIST_SIZE \
((PAGE_SIZE - sizeof(struct hugepd_freelist)) / sizeof(pte_t))



Christophe